Successful hysteroscopic management of two cases of interstitial pregnancy

Introduction. Interstitial pregnancy (IP) is the rarest type of tubal pregnancy with a high rupture rate and often remains asymptomatic in the first 10-12 gestational weeks. Therefore, the timing of the diagnosis is crucial for successful management. Case report. Two patients, aged 28 and 22, were diagnosed with IP using transvaginal ultrasound. Both patients were asymptomatic, with initial serum betahCG of 6,664 mIU/mL and 4,641 mIU/mL, respectively. Since they refused treatment with methotrexate and wanted to preserve their fertility, we performed operative hysteroscopy with resection and evacuation of the gestational tissue. The procedures were uneventful. The betahCG levels dropped significantly, and the patients were discharged after three and four hospital days, respectively. Conclusion. Using hysteroscopic procedures, we successfully treated two asymptomatic patients with IP of gestational age < 10 weeks by ultrasonography and levels of serum betahCG < 7,000 mIU/mL. With the occurrence of IP but also the numerous advantages of hysteroscopy, large, multicenter studies are necessary to further investigate the place of this approach as a single treatment method for IP. Trends and consequences observed during the COVID-19 pandemic correlate with the importance of timely diagnosis of ectopic pregnancies, the benefits of a minimally invasive approach in their treatment, and epidemiologically justified shorter hospital stays.Copyright © 2023 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.

27th Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Congress

The proceedings contain 358 papers. The topics discussed include: role of early prophylactic aspirin on Covid-19 outcome in antenatal patients - an audit of a hospital in India;partial intestinal obstruction complicating pregnancy: diagnostic dilemma and management;a case report of uterine rupture recognized during cesarean section at the site of a previous hysteroscopy-related perforation;menstrual characteristics and its related morbidities among adolescent girls living in North Borneo, Malaysia: a questionnaire-based study;the volume of posterior cervical varicose correlates with intraoperative blood loss in placenta previa;implications of large fibroids in pregnancy: a multidisciplinary approach;unexpected ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal women following laparoscopic surgery for adnexal masses - a review of 5 years;post radiotherapy outcome on cervical cancer stage IIIB patients with and without paraaortic lymph nodes enlargement;and evaluation of the relationship between thrombocytosis and clinico-pathological factors of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

A Case Report of Non-puerperal Uterine Inversion

Objective: Non-puerperal uterine inversion is a rare occurrence. The common etiology for this condition is uterine sarcoma, endometrial carcinoma, and myoma. Case Presentation: This case is a 44-year-old woman with a protruding malodorous vaginal mass, abdominal pain, and urinary retention. Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was per-formed. Conclusion: Diagnosis of uterine inversion might be difficult and requires a high index of suspicion. © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.

Efficacy and safety of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic gel to prevent intrauterine adhesion after hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Background: The electrothermal effect of hysteroscopic bipolar electrosurgical resection may cause damage to the endometrium, leading to intrauterine adhesion (IUA). Although some studies have demonstrated the efficacy and feasibility of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic (ACP) gel in preventing IUAs, controversy over its use continues. In this randomized controlled multi-center 2-arm parallel trial, we aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of ACP gel in preventing IUA after hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection and facilitate pregnancy in patients. Methods: Patients from 4 centers in China were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an intrauterine infusion of ACP gel or nothing after hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection. The randomization assignment was generated by computer and kept in a sealed envelope. A second-look hysteroscopy was performed within 3 months of the surgery. Results: From June 2018 to May 2021, 200 patients were recruited. Ultimately, 82 patients in both groups were included in the result analysis. The baseline characteristics were comparable. The outcomes were assessed by using per-protocol analysis. The incidence of IUA in the ACP gel group was lower than that in the control group [3.66% vs. 10.98%, risk ratio (RR) =0.333, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.094-1.187, P=0.072], and the planned pregnancy rate was higher than that of the control group (60.98% vs. 40.54%, RR =1.504, 95% CI: 0.949-2.384, P=0.071), but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in menstruation change. Menstrual volume remained unchanged in most cases (86.59% in ACP gel group vs. 89.02% in the control group, RR =0.877, 95% CI: 0.877-1.109, P=0.815). Menstrual volume decreased in 10 women in the ACP gel group and 8 in the control group (12.20% vs. 9.76%, RR =1.250, 95% CI: 0.520-3.007, P=0.617). No adverse effects were observed after the ACP administration. Conclusions: The present study showed that the use of ACP gel appeared to reduce both the tendency of IUA and American Fertility Society (AFS) scores and improve the subsequent pregnancy rate during hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection when treating polyps, fibroids, and uterine septum. ACP might be recommended to prevent IUA after such surgery. Further studies should be conducted with larger numbers of participants. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100047165.

Too big? A review of methods for removing large endometrial polyps in office minihysteroscopy - broadening the indications for the procedure in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. For small polyps (less than 2 cm) minihysteroscopy can be performed in an office setting. Patients with polyps larger than 2 cm are usually referred for a standard resectoscope procedure in the operation room (OR) under general anaesthesia. Those patients are exposed to longer hospital stay and possible complications of the anaesthesia. Furthermore, they usually have longer contact with many medical staff members. Limiting the time of contact as well as the number of staff involved in the procedure is particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, minihysteroscopy in an office setting should be the first choice in every possible indication. We present the methods that may be useful for removing even large polyps in minihysteroscopy. The advantages and disadvantages of every procedure are discussed.

Hysteroscopy in COVID 19 pandemic: safety concerns.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health crisis that negatively impacts the health infrastructure by diverting resources to manage this infection. The long-term impact on the health of patients due to a lack of appropriate medical care to avoid COVID-19 infection is already visible in the mortality rates of the general population. The presence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in the female genital tract is not clear. Bubbles produced during hysteroscopy tend to cool down to the temperature of the distension medium and then dissolve. Hence, aerosols are not produced during hysteroscopy, which is usually performed in an office setting. If anesthesia is required, conscious sedation or regional anesthesia should preferably be used to reduce aerosol production. Hence, hysteroscopy is not an aerosol-generating procedure and the risk of COVID-19 infection is low; therefore, hysteroscopy should not be ruled out in emergencies.

COVID 19 pandemic and minimally invasive gynecology: consequences and future perspectives.

The extent of the 2020 pandemic not only extends to the infected patients but also to patients who have been waiting for medical procedures. Reevaluation of the healthcare system is important in order to help assist the needs of intensive care units. The urgency of the gynaecological cases should be aligned based on surgical interventions and minimally invasive methods should be preferred. This will not endanger professional and other resource demands of ICUs. In acute cases, laparoscopy or hysteroscopy (preferring office hysteroscopy) should be chosen, that require no or only short period of hospitalization. Postponing non-acute surgeries is recommended to the post-pandemic period. Abbreviations: ICU: intensive care unit; COVID-19: coronavirus disease; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronaviruses; IgM-IgG: immunoglobulin M; GAGP: aerosol generating procedures; PPE: personal protective equipment; ERAS: early recovery after surgery; mESAS: modified elective surgery acuity scale; RPOC: retained product of concept; PMB: postmenopausal bleeding.

International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) guidelines and recommendations on gynecological endoscopy during the evolutionary phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has raised some important interrogations on minimally invasive gynaecological surgery. The International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) has taken upon itself the task of providing guidance and best practice policies for all practicing gynaecological endoscopists. Factors affecting decision making processes in minimal invasive surgery (MIS) vary depending on factors such as the phase of the pandemic, policies on control and prevention, expertise and existing infrastructure. Our responsibility remains ensuring the safety of all health care providers, ancillary staff and patients during this unusual period. We reviewed the current literature related to gynecological and endoscopic surgery during the Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) crisis. Regarding elective surgery, universal testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection should be carried out wherever possible 40 h prior to surgery. In case of confirmed positive case of SARS-CoV-2, surgery should be delayed. Priority should be given to relatively urgent cases such as malignancies. ISGE supports medical optimization and delaying surgery for benign non-life-threatening surgeries. When possible, we recommend to perform cases by laparoscopy and to allow early discharges. Any procedure with risk of bowel involvement should be performed by open surgery as studies have found a high amount of viral RNA (ribonucleic acid) in stool. Regarding urgent surgery, each unit should create a risk assessment flow chart based on capacity. Patients should be screened for symptoms and symptomatic patients must be tested. In the event that a confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 is found, every attempt should be made to optimize medical management and defer surgery until the patient has recovered and only emergency or life-threatening surgery should be performed in these cases. We recommend to avoid intubation and ventilation in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients and if at all possible local or regional anesthesia should be utilized. Patients who screen or test negative may have general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery while strict protocols of infection control are upheld. Surgery in screen-positive as well as SARS-CoV-2 positive patients that cannot be safely postponed should be undertaken with full PPE with ensuring that only essential personnel are exposed. If available, negative pressure theatres should be used for patients who are positive or screen high risk. During open and vaginal procedures, suction can be used to minimize droplet and bioaerosol spread. In a patient who screens low risk or tests negative, although carrier and false negatives cannot be excluded, laparoscopy should be strongly considered. We recommend, during minimal access surgeries, to use strategies to reduce production of bioaerosols (such as minimal use of energy, experienced surgeon), to reduce leakage of smoke aerosols (for example, minimizing the number of ports used and size of incisions, as well as reducing the operating pressures) and to promote safe elimination of smoke during surgery and during the ports' closure (such as using gas filters and smoke evacuation systems). During the post-peak period of pandemic, debriefing and mental health screening for staff is recommended. Psychological support should be provided as needed. In conclusion, based on the existent evidence, ISGE largely supports the current international trends favoring laparoscopy over laparotomy on a case by case risk evaluation basis, recognizing the different levels of skill and access to minimally invasive procedures across various countries.

Association of gynecological endoscopy surgeons of Nigeria (AGES) advisory on laparoscopic and hysteroscopic procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Coronavirus 2, or SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) is a global public health concern. Although there is a paucity of evidence to advise on the best practice, we recommend postponement of elective gynecological endoscopic surgeries until the pandemic is contained. Emergency surgeries should preferably be done through open surgeries than laparoscopy or hysteroscopy approach. However, if or when laparoscopy or hysteroscopy is considered, health personnel in theatre must wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and all standard precautions should be observed to prevent COVID-19 infection. When COVID-19 is highly suspected or confirmed, the patient should be referred to centers equipped in taking care of such cases.